Files

1.8 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

Review Output Template (Concise)

Use this template for review outputs. Keep each bullet short and implementable.

Context

  • Surface: (web/app) + page type (list/detail/form/dashboard/settings)
  • Primary user task:
  • Primary CTA:
  • Constraints/assumptions:

Diagnosis (pick one per major issue)

  • Execution gulf (执行鸿沟): user cant find how to do it (entry/signifier/IA/choices)

  • Evaluation gulf (评估鸿沟): user cant tell what happened (state/feedback/results)

  • Slip (失误): goal is correct, execution goes wrong (misclick, fat-finger, wrong target)

  • Mistake (错误): mental model is wrong (labels/mapping/conceptual model misleads)

Findings (prioritized)

P0 (blocker)

  • Problem:
    • Evidence:
    • Diagnosis: execution gulf / evaluation gulf; slip / mistake
    • Why it hurts:
    • Fix (specific, implementable):
    • Acceptance check:

P1 (important)

  • Problem:
    • Evidence:
    • Diagnosis: execution gulf / evaluation gulf; slip / mistake
    • Fix:
    • Acceptance check:

P2 (polish)

  • Problem:
    • Diagnosis: execution gulf / evaluation gulf (optional)
    • Fix:

Quick wins (optional)

  • 3 small changes that noticeably improve clarity or polish.

Checklist to verify (copy/paste)

  • Task clarity: primary CTA obvious and singular
  • IA: groups and headings match mental model
  • Feedback: loading/empty/error/success states present and helpful
  • Consistency: components and wording stable across screens
  • Affordance: clickable elements look clickable; icon-only is rare
  • Errors: prevention + recovery + actionable messages
  • Cognitive load: defaults and progressive disclosure reduce thinking
  • CRAP: hierarchy, alignment, spacing, grouping feel intentional
  • Modern minimal: restrained color, spacious layout, minimal copy
  • Icons: no emoji; consistent set; labels where ambiguity exists